Odds and Ends 3

I use “Odds and Ends” articles to gather several unrelated topics under a single roof. None of them standing alone would provide enough material to merit its own article. Nonetheless, collectively they might provide a few moments of amusement. These include updates, observations, user suggestions and various failed efforts on my part. If you like these kind of quick-hit stories then you can always find other Odds and Ends in the Complete Index.


Dr. Howder Strikes Again

I spoke of Dr. Howder Road about three months ago. Back then I wrote:

“I can’t prove it yet, but I’m working under the theory that Dr. Howder had passed away during a period when rural roads were being converted in Fayette County and one of his cousins decided it was a fitting memorial to someone who’d provided a public service for nearly 70 years. I’m not sure I’ll ever solve this mystery short of a resident of Dr. Howder Rd. stumbling across this page randomly and filling in the details.”

Well, even better, one of Dr. Howder’s great-grandchildren stumbled across the page. He consulted his 93-year-old grandmother who solved the mystery. My working theory was close to the actual explanation but it was not exactly right. Dr. Howder had a cabin in the area. He also had a neighbor, a Mr. Hawkins, who needed the road for better access to his farm sometime in the years after Dr. Howder passed away. Mr. Hawkins was the person responsible for naming the road in honor of his friend and neighbor, Dr. Howder.


Markers Along the Trans-Canada Highway

Longitudinal Centre of Canada. Photo by Tony Webster; (CC BY-SA 2.0)

I’m sensing many more geo-oddity places to visit along the Trans-Canada Highway than I ever imagined. I featured locations corresponding to the Dominion Land Survey and the 100th Meridian in recent articles. Now, Fritz Keppler, our “county counter extraordinaire” adds two more sites to the Trans-Canada marker list (in a comment): the Longitudinal Centre of Canada and the halfway point of the highway itself.

Could a road trip along the Trans-Canada Highway be a possibility in the future? We’ll just have to wait and see.


More Google Maps Weirdness

Peter from New Mexico wrote recently and wondered about an anomaly along the Rio Grande River near El Paso, Texas:

If Google Maps is to be believed, then someone driving along the Cesar E. Chavez Border Highway would clip a small corner of Mexico without ever having to go through any kind of border control. This would be an easy pickup for someone wanting to record a “visit” to Mexico without actually having to hassle with customs and immigration. He wanted to know if this was too good to be true.

We’ve seen numerous instances where boundaries implied by Google Maps don’t correspond exactly to reality. Usually it’s just a few feet. This error would be a whopper, something closer to a deviation of 500 feet (150 metres). Nonetheless I consulted three different map sources including a topographic map and Google was the only one that drew a knob north of the Rio Grande at this location.

I want to be wrong — I’d love to be wrong — so I’m hoping someone can prove this otherwise. Unfortunately I think this is Google’s mistake instead of a tantalizing chunk of Mexican territory encroaching north of the river.

[UPDATE: Google modified its map, and the knob disappeared, as we suspected]


That Confounding Left Turn

The left turn in Albuquerque from the Looney Tunes Geography article generated some great speculation. Reader John Deeth developed a theory about an inside joke that may have had meaning to our forebears traveling on the old Route 66. It would have faded into obscurity with the rise of the Interstate highway system. I tend to agree with John’s theory and I tried to prove it. However, I stopped looking after hours of fruitless searching and banging my head against a wall. I still believe the underlying premise but I couldn’t find a smoking gun or anything more than what John already found.


Brezovica pri Metliki

I discovered this interesting little tidbit while looking at borders recently.

This is one seriously messed-up boundary segment between Slovenia and Croatia, an area called Brezovica pri Metliki. It’s new to me but other sources have already discussed it. It’s not worth going into detail when it’s already known, but I present it to you in case it’s new to you as well.

[UPDATE: I broke down and wrote about it anyway]

Comments

3 responses to “Odds and Ends 3”

  1. Matt Avatar
    Matt

    The problem with the Albuquerque idea is that Central Avenue actually meets Rio Grande Blvd. at a nearly 90 degree angle: http://maps.google.com/?ll=35.095193,-106.67141&spn=0.014467,0.030513&z=15&vpsrc=6&layer=c&cbll=35.094922,-106.670756&panoid=fHXr1P57NnMhBJRW5b6sHg&cbp=12,306.57,,0,-0.51.

    In 1937, Rio Grande Blvd. dead-ended at Central, but even then, it doesn’t look like a real Y-intersection: http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/topo/new_mexico/txu-pclmaps-topo-nm-albuquerque-1937.jpg. A Route 66 traveler would not need to make a “left turn.”

  2. William Cary Avatar

    Left of Albuquerque on a map was LA (one would have been heading away from El Paso to turn left and get there via a left turn). Possibly this meant “I should have turned for home at Albuquerque”. (Of course, one could turn left from any starting direction and wind up 90 degrees off in another direction.) I doubt that was their intent in the joke as it is just not funny and it doesn’t have enough Looney Tunes punch. Having a Looney Tunes character stating to the audience “I should have quit” wasn’t on the minds of the writers or Mel Blanc who rewrote and revised subtly as he thought necessary.

    The reason Bugs Bunny and the other Looney Tunes characters made a reference to a “left turn at Albuquerque” probably had little to do with geographical direction and more to do with a metaphorical direction. Was Albuquerque or New Mexico infamous for something during that era? I am positive that this was meant as a broader joke then than we are thinking of today. Bugs may have been referring to “I should have changed my life’s direction” or “I shouldn’t have done what I did in Albuquerque”. My thoughts are that Albuquerque must have been a rip-roaring town, a sin city back in the forties. I also am aware of the clandestine atomic testing that went on in the New Mexican hinterlands. Alas, it could have been merely that Albuquerque was the “Beautiful Downtown Burbank” of its day. That would have been a reference to the boredom a writer had felt when stuck there overnight with nothing to do. No lights, no phones, no cigarettes: not a single luxury.

    It just seems that a joke retold this often had to have had multiple levels (one meaning for children and a deeper meaning for adults) and an inside meaning to some, otherwise it would have been repressed by the writers as being stale and repetitious.

    To those good citizens of Albuquerque today I ask:

    Was Albuquerque infamous for anything in the forties?

    Was Albuquerque ever a “sin city” even for ranchers and cowboys?

    Did Albuquerque have a particularly boisterous preacher during the 1940’s that spoke of changing people?

    There’s more to Albuquerque that that rabbit let on and for opening that argument he’s “deespickabull!”

  3. stangetz Avatar
    stangetz

    Could it be simply because “Albuquerque” is fun for a cartoon character to say? Like Timbuktu?

    Those two places seem to pop up everywhere in cartoons. I’d guess it because of the name, rather than anything else….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Comments

  1. Technically it’s not always correct to say EST/CST, etc…. but just an indication that I’m changing time zone is enough,…

  2. In general, I wonder why navigating from the Atlantic Ocean to the Black Sea doesn’t count as inland navigation.

  3. Re: East/West Carroll parishes, you’re close, but the real reason for the split was more political than demographic or cultural.…