Fighting Words

If someone named a town “Battle” then I would expect that it might commemorate a great conflict taking place nearby. I believed most logical people would find that a reasonable conclusion. So I examined several occurrences and discovered that it wasn’t necessarily the case. Usually the battles referenced were rather inconsequential or not even battles at all. In the United States, battles involved Native Americans invariably quarreling with settlers of European descent or amongst themselves. I think it said more about the mindset of those who named the towns rather than the original native inhabitants.


Battle Creek, Michigan, USA

Downtown Battle Creek, Michigan - October 2-3, 2014. Photo by Corey Seeman; (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Twelve Mile Circle began this entire tangent while pondering Battle Creek, Michigan. I’d been examining historical files that referenced the city. Certainly I’d heard of Battle Creek before although it was the first time I’d actually considered the name. What battle at what creek did early settlers want posterity to remember? Certainly it must have been immense.

However, maybe time and distance faded the collective memory because I wasn’t aware of any conflicts in that area. I made it my duty to uncover those long-ago events so that a new generation could understand the sacrifices of those who may have fought and died valiantly for a noble cause.

The History

The City of Battle Creek reported its etymology as, “named for a skirmish between a government land surveyor and two Indians which took place seven miles away and almost 175 years ago.” That didn’t sound too promising. Heritage Battle Creek provided additional details:

“The story of white settlement of the Battle Creek area begins in 1825 when government surveyors were working near a stream about 8 miles northeast of the present city of Battle Creek. On March 14 two Potawatomi Indians appeared at the base camp, asking for food. A protracted, contentious discussion ended when the surveyors produced a rifle and settled the argument by subduing the Indians. After reporting the skirmish to the Territorial Governor, the surveyors left the field and returned to Detroit. A subsequent survey team remembered the incident and assigned the name ‘Battle Creek’ to the stream where the altercation took place.”

Whatever…

A brief argument underpinned the name of a town of fifty thousand residents? Call me underwhelmed.

I found more recent Battle Creek events from a century ago infinitely more fascinating. The Kellogg brothers invented cold breakfast cereal here in 1906. Battle Creek became “Cereal City” with Kellogg’s (map) founded in the city as well as Post Cereals. Fruit Loops, Frosted Flakes, Rice Krispies, Apple Jacks and Eggo Waffles all had greater impact on popular culture than a surveyor annoyed by a couple of hungry Indians.

Some other Battle Creek places

  • Nebraska: Battle Creek: The Pawnee avoided a conflict with settlers. No actual battle or bloodshed resulted.
  • Iowa: Battle Creek: Another town already took the original name, Willow Dale. Someone recalled that maybe there had been a battle with the Sioux nearby a long time ago and proposed the name.

More appropriate names for the three Battle Creeks would be Quarrel Creek, Acquiescence Creek and Apocryphal Creek.


Battle Ground, Washington, USA

Laurelwood Brewing - Battleground, WA. Photo by howderfamily.com; (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

A couldn’t find a decent photo of Battle Ground, Washington (map) so I used this photo of a brewpub I visited when I drove through there a couple of years ago. It’s a suburb of Portland, Oregon, basically.

The History

The story of the “battle” of Battle Ground was even more ridiculous than the various Battle Creeks. The city said,

“Battle Ground owes its name to an encounter between U.S. soldiers stationed at Fort Vancouver and Native Americans who lived in an encampment near the Fort. In 1855, a group of the Indians, led by Chief Umtuch, left the encampment and headed for the Cascade Mountains to the east. U.S. Captain William Strong led a company in pursuit of the group and many believed that there would be a battle between them when they met. Captain Strong and his troops caught up with the Indians near present day Battle Ground. After lengthy negotiations, the Indians agreed to return to the encampment.”

An Alternate View

Someone killed Chief Umtuch. Nobody quite knew whether U.S. soldiers did it or whether more militant elements of the Klickitat were responsible. After a tense standoff, the Native Americans asked only to be able to bury Chief Umtuch privately and in accordance with their traditions. Captain Strong granted the request and the conflict ended. Recent settlers, fully expecting the Army to punish the Indians, were livid when they learned that nothing would happen. HistoryLink.org provided the rest of the story that the City of Battle Ground decided to sidestep:

“When told that the Indians had been left unguarded to mourn and bury their chief, the whites were incensed. Strong reportedly was attacked by an enraged settler wielding a knife and suffered a cut to his face before subduing the man. Adding insult to this injury, the women of the fort presented Strong with a red petticoat, which they said should henceforth be used as his unit’s banner… The area in which Chief Umtuch met his end was known at that time as Old Burn. It was briefly and mockingly renamed Strong’s Battle Ground, which was quickly shortened to simply Battle Ground after the Indians had peacefully returned.”

Thus, not only did nothing like a battle ever happen at Battle Ground, settlers bestowed the name sarcastically.

Some other “Battle” places in the United States

  • Indiana: Battle Ground: At least this one involved a real battle, the Battle of Tippecanoe with the Shawnee
  • Minnesota: Battle Lake: A conflict between a handful of Ojibway and Sioux
  • Nevada: Battle Mountain: No known battle; local legends about conflicts involving Paiute and/or Shoshone

Battle, East Sussex, England

Harold dead bayeux tapestry. Creater unknown, suspected to be commissioned by Matilda of Flanders, Odo of Bayeux or Edith of Wessex, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Twelve Mile Circle had much better luck with a Battle in East Sussex, England (map). When the English named a place “Battle” they weren’t messing around. I’ll let the town of Battle explain:

“The attractive town of Battle gets it name from the Battle of Hastings, which was fought between Harold the Saxon king and William the Conqueror in 1066. The battle was so significant it changed the course of English history. The town grew up around the Abbey of St Martin which was built by William the Conqueror after the battle.”

That battle truly deserved a town named Battle!


Battle Harbour, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

battle harbour. Photo by Matt MacGillivray; (CC BY 2.0)

Canada had a Battle too, the appearance of Battle Harbour, Newfoundland and Labrador (map). It used to be quite a popular settlement in nineteenth century Canada. Many considered it an unofficial Capital of Labrador.

However, it fell on hard times as the cod fishing industry contracted. Eventually everyone abandoned Battle Harbour, with its inhabitants resettled by the Canadian government in the 1960’s. Today it is a summertime tourist destination, a well-preserved historical remnant with a few guest cottages and small hotels.

Also, there wasn’t a battle. Some believed that the name probably derived from an Anglicization of an old Portuguese word for boat (batal). It appeared as such on maps dating back to 1560.

Comments

2 responses to “Fighting Words”

  1. Steve Spivey Avatar
    Steve Spivey

    I’ve just seen a commercial for a new detective show called “Battle Creek”, set in MI.

  2. Daisy Avatar

    Ahhh Battle Creek. When I was a kid you use to be able to tour the Kellogg’s Cereal factory. Rumor has it that in 1986 someone stole a top secret recipe when on a factory tour so in turn they stopped giving tours. The factory is in a town named Battle Creek. On a trip through MI a few years ago I wanted to stop and see if we could find a Tony the Tiger statue to take a picture with. We asked around and a guy in the bus station told me if we went to the corporate headquarters that they have stuff inside the lobby. He pointed out the building and we headed that direction. We went inside and the girl at the security desk told us there are absolutely no photos allowed anywhere on their property. Then I asked her if there was anywhere in town we could get a photo of anything Kellogg’s. She started to say no and then she handed me a little slip of paper with directions to their old factory. And my little slip I mean maybe 2 inches tall. She said that if I follow those directions it would get us to the factory then to pick up the phone and ask security to see if they will let us inside the fence for a picture. Talk about a strange adventure. We felt like secret agents! In the end we did get the picture that I wanted. You can see it here —> http://www.curiousdaisy.com/wordpress/2010/11/they%E2%80%99re-grrrrreat/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Comments

  1. Clint, 24 March 2021. I’m 89 years old and have traveled the 100th Meridian for years between Uvalde, TX and…

  2. Many of these comments are very interesting, have enjoyed reading. We cross several times a year as well going from…